Loes Ebeling Koning vs Ania Hertel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 08 May at 09:42 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Ebeling Koning vs A. Hertel

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win

POL
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Koning 1 - 0 Hertel
They have played 2 sets in total, with Loes Ebeling Koning winning 2 and Ania Hertel winning 0. The last match between Loes Ebeling Koning and Ania Hertel was at the W15 Kalmar, 08-05-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Loes Ebeling Koning getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Koning | 1 |
| Hertel | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W15 Kalmar(05-08-25)
L. E. Koning vs A. Hertel H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 62.14% (64-39) | Career Total W/L | 51.39% (148-140) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
L. E. Koning vs A. Hertel Match Preview:
- How do their second serve performances compare? Koning has won 38.92% of points on their second serve in the last six months, slightly less effective than Hertel, who has managed 40.14%.
- What about return game strength? Koning has a slight edge, winning 53.48% of second serve return points compared to Hertel's 50.47%. Koning also leads in first serve returns at 31.74% against Hertel's 30.26%.
- Under pressure, Hertel excels at saving breakpoints with 51.78% compared to Koning's 49.55%.
- Looking at overall performance, Koning has a significant advantage, securing 61.4% of matches over the past year versus Hertel's 34.62%.
- On their favored surface, both players prefer clay. Koning excels here with a win rate of 65%, outperforming Hertel's 48% on the same surface.
- In the context of tournament levels, Koning has shown stronger performance at Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, winning 65.85% of matches compared to Hertel's 42.42%.
- Koning has faced tougher competition on average, with opponents ranked 324.4, against Hertel's 368.06.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Koning shows better endurance, winning 55% of such situations, while Hertel manages only 24%.
- During break points, both players convert opportunities similarly, with Koning at 39.6% and Hertel at 39.34%.
Editorial Prediction (May 8, 2025, UTC):
Koning's recent performance trends indicate a slight advantage in second serve returns and overall match-winning percentage. These factors suggest a more consistent ability to capitalize on opponents' weaknesses.
While Hertel demonstrates resilience in saving breakpoints and has a comparable breakpoint conversion rate, Hertel's lower win percentage indicates potential susceptibility during matches.
Considering surface preference, competitive level, and match experience against stronger opponents, Koning holds a favorable position. Koning's higher success in deciding sets further solidifies their position as the preferred winner.
Based on these analytical comparisons, Koning is most likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming tennis match.
Loes Ebeling Koning vs Ania Hertel Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. E. Koning vs A. Hertel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:25:21 | Average Match Time | 1:25:21 |
| 53% (26/49) | 1st Serve % | 58% (32/55) |
| 73% (19/26) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (21/32) |
| 70% (16/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (8/23) |
| 43% (3/7) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/1) |
| 47% (26/55) | Return Points Win % | 29% (14/49) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. E. Koning Recent Matches Played
A. Hertel Recent Matches Played

L. E. Koning vs A. Hertel Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.14% (64/39) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.39% (148/140) |
| 61.21% (142/90) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.75% (339/329) |
| 55.62% (1188/948) | Games Win/Loss | 50.26% (3150/3118) |
| 56.00% (14/11) | Hard Win/Loss | 47.89% (34/37) |
| 67.14% (47/23) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.19% (110/93) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 28.57% (4/10) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 217 | Aces Total | 620 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 262 | Total Double Faults | 874 |
| 1:26:57 | Average Match Time | 1:39:31 |
| 344.83 | Average Opponent Rank | 449.44 |
| 57% (3306/5831) | 1st Serve % | 59% (10239/17483) |
| 63% (2093/3306) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (6406/10239) |
| 46% (1152/2525) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (3102/7244) |
| 50% (357/720) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (978/2090) |
| 46% (2602/5596) | Return Points Win % | 45% (7809/17351) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 56.82% (25/19) | Challenger W/L | 39.62% (42/64) |
| 67.24% (39/19) | Futures W/L | 58.56% (106/75) |
| 63% (64/102) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (145/285) |
| 41% (7/17) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (33/62) |
| 48% (13/27) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (48/95) |
| 86% (64/55) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (144/119) |
| 14% (64/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (144/25) |
| 23% (39/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (144/28) |